Just yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court overturned that state's medical malpractice "cap" because it limited compensation to injured persons.
Specifically, the Court ruled that the law violated the state Constitution's "separation of powers" clause, because it took away power that should rest solely with judges.
Eleven states now have abolished their medical malpractice caps. Patients in those states are now entitled to receive the full compensation that a judge or jury of their peers awards to them. In other states, including Virginia, the amount that a jury decides is fair compensation to an injured person is often automatically reduced by statute.
If you think Virginia should join states like Illinois in ending its restriction on a victim's right to recover, contact your delegate or state senator today.
In the last several days there have been encouraging stories in the media reporting that the U.S. Senate, as it mulls over the health care reform bill, is pushing hard to prevent health and medical malpractice insurance companies from fixing prices.
In 1945 Congress allowed insurers to become exempt from anti-trust regulations that guard against price-fixing. In a letter to President Obama, Senate leaders urged him to support the repeal of these exemptions, pointing out “These acts hurt consumers, drive up health care costs, and should be prohibited in the health insurance industry, as they are in virtually every other industry.”
As I've stated in previous blog posts, limiting injured persons' right to recover, otherwise known as "tort reform", bears little to no relation to a decrease in health costs through lowering medical malpractice premiums. Preventing insurance companies from making back-room deals to fix prices and keep premiums artificially high, however, is bound to have an appreciable, positive effect on the affordability of health care.
If you agree, contact your senator in short order and say so.
If you or a loved one has been injured by the negligence of another, contact click here to email an experienced lawyer at Williamson and Lavecchia or call us at (804) 288-1661 to protect your rights.
In an appalling story covered by multiple new outlets recently, a California Emergency Room physician was indicted in August for grand theft after stealing a Rolex watch from a dead patient.
The family of the dead man have filed a wrongful death lawsuit. The allegation is that the doctor did not make appropriate efforts to resuscitate the patient, who died of a heart attack. The doctor then pocketed the dead man's Rolex watch, and was apprehended by security soon afterward.
While the great majority of medical malpractice/negligence cases are far less egregious than this, they do happen often. If you or a loved one has been hurt by medical negligence, protect your rights by contacing an attorney at Williamson & Laveccia.
You can't open a newspaper or turn on a television or radio these days without hearing about health care reform. One term some politicians and pundits like to toss into that discussion is "tort reform."
"Tort reform" refers to placing limitations on citizen's rights when they have suffered an injury at the hands of a wrongdoer. In the context of health care, it can mean limits on how much a patient can recover when he has been injured due to medical negligence, or making it more difficult for that patient to pursue his case.
Those in favor of "tort reform" argue that it will drive down health care costs. Not so, says Prof Gerard Anderson of Johns Hopkins' School of Public Health: "Tort reform as discussed in the United States would probably have very little impact. The states that have enforced tort reform have about the same amount of litigation-- and the awards are comparable-- as states that don't". (from 8/26/09 Baltimore Sun Article).
The federal government agrees. The Congressional Budget Office reports: "The evidence available to date does not make a strong case that restricting malpractice liability would have a significant effect."
Even giant insurance companies have to admit this truth. WellPoint has said that litigation and so-called defensive medicine "are not considered a recent significant factor in the overall growth of health care spending."
Don't be fooled. Under "tort reform", YOU lose, and the only winners are insurance companies.
If you or a loved one has been injured as a result of medical malpractice and you want to protect your rights, contact an attorney at Williamson & Lavecchia, LC.
WebMD.com has a useful article on preventing medication errors in hospitals. Suggestions including bringing your medications with you to the hospital, asking if you should continue taking your home medications, and most importantly asking questions. If you are not familiar with a medication a nurse is about to administer, ask for the name of the medication, the purpose, and how often you need it. You may find out that the medication was intended for another patient or the nurse was about to give it at the wrong dose. Your questions could literally be a lifesaver. Click here to read the article.
We continue to hear from victims of medication errors throughout Virginia. If you believe that you have been injured by a medication error, you are welcome to contact us by email or to call us at (804) 288-1661 to discuss your situation.
Virginia has had a medical malpractice cap for approximately 30 years. What that means is there is an arbitrary limit to the amount a victim of medical malpractice may recover regardless of how badly the victim was injured or the amount of medical bills or lost wages. Currently the cap is $2,000,000.
$2,000,000 is sufficient in most cases, but there are no exceptions to the cap. In many cases the cap creates an incredible injustice. Take the hypothetical example of a doctor or nurse who negligently overdoses a 40 year old patient on medications which cause a brain injury. The patient remains hospitalized for 1-2 months and incurs medical expenses over $500,000. He can no longer work at his job paying $50,000/year. He will require in home care or permanent placement in a nursing home at a cost of over $50,000/year. Therefore even without compensating him for his tremendous pain and loss of enjoyment of life, his medical bills and lost income exceed the maximum recovery under the Virginia:
$500,000 past medical expenses + $1,250,000 in lost income until age 65 + $1,750,000 in future medical bills (based on average life expectancy)
Total medical bills and lost income = $3.5 million
The victim under Virginia law can only collect $2,000,000 leaving him with $1.5 million in uncompensated medical bills and lost income. Again we are not even taking into account his tremendous loss of enjoyment of life, dignity, pain, and suffering.
We believe that every person and every company should take responsibility for the consequences of their negligence including doctors, nursing homes, hospitals, assisted living facilities, pharmacists, lawyers, truck drivers, contractosr, etc.
If you believe that you or a loved one is a victim of medical malpractice, you are welcome to contact us by phone at (804) 288-1661 or click here to contact us by email to discuss your legal rights. We represent victims of malpractice and other types of wrongful conduct throughout Virginia including Richmond, Petersburg, Fredericksburg, Charlottesville, Hampton Roads, and northern Virginia.
Many of the pediatricians would admit the mistake, but only if it were obvious. In other words, they would admit their mistake only if the parents would find out on their own. The distinction between obvious malpractice and hidden malpractice is unethical according this article. Amongst the most common errors are accidental overdose and adverse reactions to medication. This issue became prominent when Dennis Quaid's newborn children were given massive overdoses of a blood thinner. As I've discussed on recent blog posts, overdoses of blood thinners like Coumadin, Lovenox, and Heparin can be lethal and Dennis Quaid's children are fortunate to be alive. That is why there is a "black box" warning on the physician information sheets for these blood thinners.
As parents we have to trust our children's pediatricians to provide quality care and we expect them to be upfront about their mistakes so we are fully informed about the health of our children and equally importantly so the pediatrician ensures that no other children are harmed.
One of the most common statements we hear from clients as medical malpractice attorneys is that they want to make sure no one else is a victim of medical malpractice. That point is important. From my experience, a small percentage of physicians commit much of the medical malpractice. By holding physicians including pediatricians accountable through medical malpractice claims, you send a strong message that malpractice can not be tolerated and you help to protect other patients from needless suffering.
At Williamson & Lavecchia, L.C. we have represented clients throughout Virginia who range in ages from infants to those in their 90s living in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. If you or a family member has been a victim of medical malpractice, please call us at (804) 288-1661 or click here to contact us by email.
New to our website library is "Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case" authored by Tom Williamson. Unlike automobile injuries, medical malpractice cases are less likely to settle and more likely to go to trial. In choosing a medical malpractice attorney, you want to hire an attorney with extensive experience trying medical malpractice cases. Tom Williamson is our senior trial lawyer with thirty years of experience. Tom recently lectured to fellow attorneys about the trial of a medical malpractice case. The publication "Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case" is a chapter in a leading desktop reference for Virginia trial attorneys.
While this publication is written for attorneys you are invited to read it to gain a better understanding of the complexities of medical malpractice trials. If you or a loved one has been a victim of medical malpractice, please call us at (804) 288-1661 or email us for a free consultation.
Yesterday evening I was speaking to a group of senior citizens at a Triad meeting in Madison County, Virginia about the rights and remedies for nursing home residents. One of the best questions asked was what are the minimal staffing requirements for nursing homes in Virginia. In other words if there are 60 patients on a nursing home wing, how many nurses and nursing assistants (CNA) must the nursing home provide?
The answer shocked the crowd. Neither Virginia nor federal law provides for a minimal staffing requirement. Unlike day care centers for children, there is no regulation on the number of nurses and CNAs that must be on duty at nursing homes.
The tougher question is why do daycare centers have minimal staffing requirements and nursing homes do not? In both settings the people being cared for are dependent on the employees for their health and welfare. The difference is lobbying. The nursing home industry is a multi-billion dollar industry and growing. The industry has a slew of highly paid lobbyists who oppose minimal staffing requirements because increasing staffing levels cuts into profits.
If you or a loved one is a victim of nursing home neglect, please contact us to discuss your legal rights. In fact we have a website devoted to right of victims of elder abuse. You are welcome to call us at (804) 288-1661 or click here to email us for a free consultation.
A nursing home aide has been charged with abusing and sexually assaulting a patient. The aide is accused of fondling a blind man while bathing him. I should point out at the start that most nursing home employees are dedicated to the well-being of their patients. However, nursing home patients are extremely vulnerable to mental, physical and sexual abuse and nursing homes must take reasonable steps to protect their patients. Their vulnerability comes from the fact that most patients suffer from illnesses and physical disabilities that limit their ability to speak out and protect themselves. That is coupled with the fact that many patients require partial or total assistance with bathing, toileting, and dressing.
Nursing homes can minimize the risk of physical, mental, and sexual abuse of their residents by taking reasonable steps to protect them. For one, they can check the online sexual predator registries before hiring. Secondly, they can obtain the criminal records of potential employees. Just as importantly, they must supervise and monitor their employees. All complaints and allegations of abuse need to be taken seriously. Just because a patient suffers from confusion does not mean that their allegations should be disregarded.
The case that I am referencing occurred in Oklahoma, but Virginia is not immune to these types of crimes. A few years ago a patient at a Richmond area nursing home was sexually assaulted by an aide who was subsequently convicted in Henrico Circuit Court.
If a loved one has been abused in a Virginia nursing home, please contact us by email or call us at (804) 288-1661 for a free consultation. We represent victims of nursing home abuse and neglect throughout Virginia including in Richmond, Henrico, Chesterfield, Fredericksburg, northern Virginia, Hampton Roads, and Charlottesville.
As you may have heard Medicare is now rating nursing homes on a scale of 1 to 5 stars. This morning I searched for all nursing homes in a 25 mile radius of our office in Henrico County. The search showed that there are 25 nursing homes in the area. Most astonishing 13 of the 25 nursing homes earned only 1 star! Two nursing homes earned only 2 stars. At the same time only one facility, Children's Hospital, earned five stars.
People can argue about the significance of the star ratings. The nursing homes defend themselves by arguing that the ratings reflect past mistakes, and do not reflect future performance. By theory they may have a point. A nursing home that has neglected patients in the past can turn itself around. Hopefully, the rating system will provide a strong incentive for nursing homes to improve care so they can improve their grade.
In my opinion, the star ratings are an important tool for families to assess the quality of nursing homes. The star ratings both help families find good nursing homes and they also help families monitor the quality of care their loved ones are receiving.
An important question is if a family member is injured in a nursing home, does the star ratings prove negligence? The answer is that it can help prove that the nursing home was negligent. For example, if the nursing home received a low star because they were cited for neglecting your loved one, we can issue a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the investigative papers from the Department of Health including notes of interviews with staff members. Even if the poor rating is not based on the care of your loved one, it may show a pattern of understaffing, false documentation of medical records, malnutrition, pressure ulcers or falls.
Ultimately, if your loved one has been injured or neglected in a nursing home, the star ratings is a tool for you to use to learn whether the nursing home has been complying with federal and state regulations. For more information about nursing home malpractice, please click here to visit our nursing home abuse and neglect website.
If you believe a loved one is a victim of nursing home abuse and neglect, please contact us by email or call us at (804) 288-1661 to discuss your legal rights. Unfortunately, Virginia has a short statute of limitations so time is of the essence.
Over 2 million cribs were recalled last month in the USA and Canada. The cribs were manufactured by Stork Craft, which makes cribs for brands such as Fisher Price.
All the products were so-called "drop side cribs", on which one side of the crib can be lowered to make it easier to take the baby out. However, hardware problems can cause a gap in which a baby's heat can get caught, which in turn can lead to suffocation. Four children have died from this defect in the U.S.
If so, the manufacturer will send a free repair kit, and you are urged to discontinue use of the crib until you can implement the kit.
While we should all be aware of any dangers related to the products we use in every day life, it is especially important to be vigilant about those products that might pose hidden dangers for our small children, who themselves cannot appreciate these dangers.
On November 19 a Florida jury awarded the plaintiff $300 million dollars in the case of Naugle v. Phillip Morris USA. The plaintiff had become wheelchair bound as a result of emphysema after a history of cigarette-smoking.
That figure included some $244 million in punitive damages against the cigarette maker.
This is the largest verdict in a so-called 'Engle' case to date. Engle v. RJ Reynolds was a US Supreme Court case that rejected the attempt to use a massive class-action to fight cigarette manufacturers. As a result, many plaintiffs are fighting the battle on their own.
People suffer injuries every day from their use of consumer products, not just obivously dangerous ones like cigarettes. If you or a loved one has been injured through your use of some product, contact an attorney at Williamson and Lavecchia to protect your rights.
The Government Accountability Office reported this week that of the tests that the FDA ordered drugmakers to perform in thlast 16 years, over a third of them have not been done.
These drugs are already on the market, and with many of them, doctors and patients are still unsure whether they are beneficial, or even harmful.
The FDA claims that leglislation from 2007 gives them greater power to mandate this type of testing, but there remains a considerable backlog on tests unperformed.
As a result, it is possible for the end-user (the patient) to experience complications or side effects, the risks of which they were totally unaware of.
If you've experienced an injury or illness from taking medicine that did not state that such complications were a risk, contact an experienced attorney to find out how you can protect your rights.
According to Associated Press reports today, Johnson & Johnson has recalled some of the children's and infants' Liquid Tylenol it produced this year due to possible bacterial contamination. The company recalled nearly two dozen varieties. A complete list is available here.
If your child has taken liquid Tylenol recently, please make sure to check this list to prevent injury or illness. If you or a loved one has become sick or hurt after taking Tylenol or any other medication due to someone else's negligence, contact an attorney at Williamson & Lavecchia to protect your rights.
This week's issue of Virginia Lawyers Weekly contained a feature on the largest Virginia verdicts of 2009. At Number 11 was a medical malpractice case successfully handled by two Williamson & Lavecchia lawyers, Jonathan M. Petty and Timothy Litzenburg.
Williamson & Lavecchia won a $3.7 million dollar verdict on behalf of a victim of medical malpractice. Here's a link to the article.
A defamation lawsuit against the Dixie Chicks was dismissed this week in federal court. The suit sought damages for comments made by members of the band at a 2007 rally and on their website suggesting that the plaintiff was involved in the murder of his 8 year old stepson.
The man insisted that these accusations were false. However, the U.S. District Court judge ruled that the plaintiff could not show malice on the part of the country music singers.
In Virginia, defamation consist of three elements: publication of a statement (i.e. saying or writing it to someone else); the falsity of that statement which harms the person it is about; and fault on the part of the defendant.
Fault can be found from actual malice or from reckless disregard of the truth.
Virginia law permits punitive damages to be awarded when the wrongdoer's conduct was particularly malicious or reflects a conscious disregard for the safety of others.