Lawsuits not only compensate victims for serious injuries, but they serve as an important incentive for manufacturers to design safer products, healthcare providers to provide better healthcare, and drivers to drive safer.
This week's issue of Virginia Lawyers Weekly contained a feature on the largest Virginia verdicts of 2009. At Number 11 was a medical malpractice case successfully handled by two Williamson & Lavecchia lawyers, Jonathan M. Petty and Timothy Litzenburg.
Williamson & Lavecchia won a $3.7 million dollar verdict on behalf of a victim of medical malpractice. Here's a link to the article.
A defamation lawsuit against the Dixie Chicks was dismissed this week in federal court. The suit sought damages for comments made by members of the band at a 2007 rally and on their website suggesting that the plaintiff was involved in the murder of his 8 year old stepson.
The man insisted that these accusations were false. However, the U.S. District Court judge ruled that the plaintiff could not show malice on the part of the country music singers.
In Virginia, defamation consist of three elements: publication of a statement (i.e. saying or writing it to someone else); the falsity of that statement which harms the person it is about; and fault on the part of the defendant.
Fault can be found from actual malice or from reckless disregard of the truth.
Travis County, Texas settled a case against it this week involving misconduct by one of its police officers. During a traffic stop in May, the officer became very aggressive with a 72 year old woman,shoving her and eventually turning his taser on her.
To be fair, the woman was rather uncooperative and dared him to taser her. However, she clearly posed no physical threat to the officer, who was far bigger than she. While the police department admits no wrongdoing, those of us who have seen the video on the internet know that this woman was entitled to compensation.
While the great majority of those in whom we place our collective trust-- be they policemen, doctors, or anyone else-- carry out their duties with diligence and honor, there are always exceptions.
If you've been injured as a result of someone's wrongdoing or negligence, protect your rights by contacting an attorney at Williamson and Lavecchia, LC.
The Medical Spa industry is booming, according to a Sep. 2 article in the National Law Journal. The number of these facilities has nearly quadrupled in the last five years. Medical spas are facilities that offer cosmetic treatments using medical devices, such as lasers.
Often, however, these treatments are not overseen by a doctor. Improper use of laser, mesotherapy, and other techniques can and has caused scarring, burning, pain and infection for the clients of the "spa". Futhermore, Medical Spas' representations can be misleading, implying that there is almost no risk of side effects. It seems a risky proposition indeed to undergo a medical procedure at the hands of one of these Medical Spas.
If you or someone you know has been injured as a result of a procedure at a so-called Medical Spa, call 804-288-1661, or click here to contact a lawyer at Williamson and Lavecchia.
Absolutely. In most cases under both Virginia and federal law a patient has a right to access his or her medical records. The hospital can not hold your medical records hostage because you are contemplating filing a medical malpractice lawsuit. Under Virginia law, a hospital or doctor's office must provide you with copies of your medical records within 15 days of receiving a proper request. If the doctor or hospital fails to produce your medical records within 15 days, your attorney may issue a subpoena for your records. Nursing homes are required to make the records available for review within 24 hours and to provide you with copies within 48 hours.
What happens if the nursing home, doctor or hospital ignores the subpoena?
Your attorney may file a motion with the court to obtain the records, attorneys fees, and other sanctions. Click here to read a Court Order I obtained against a podiatrist for failing to produce his patient's medical records.
If your health care provider is refusing to let you access your medical records, please call us at (804) 288-1661 or click here to email us to see if we can help.
According to an article in the New York Times on January 11, doctors are now rethinking the benefits of keeping patients in intensive care.Recent studies have shown that spending any length of time in an intensive care unit, even a few days, can lead to long-term detrimental effects. Some patients emerge from ICUswith concentration problems or having lost a significant portion of their former strength. Many are weak for years afterward, or weigh significantly less than they had before. Even post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is not uncommon.
For decades, health professionalsconsidered it a success just to get a patient out of intensive care. Now, it seems that is only half the battle. What people lose in those ICU rooms, be it strength, focus or stamina, tends to not come back fully in the long run.
Doctors supposed that the safest thing to do in the ICU was to avoid disturbing the patients, letting them rest around the clock. A new school of thought is proving to have overwhelmingly positive consequences, however. Doctors have found that by taking patients off of their sedatives periodically (say, once a day) and waking them up, it helps to maintain the patient’s awareness of reality and can prevent many of the lasting effects mentioned above. Some patients are even encouraged to walk a bit, if they are able. Amazingly, introducing some type of activity into ICU patient’s lives rather than leaving them to rest results in faster recovery times.
U.S. News & World Report is known for its top rankings of colleges, universities, hospital, etc. Recently they have begun ranking states for providing nursing home care. Virginia scores close to the very bottom for nursing home staffing. Virginia was the 8th worst state for nursing home staffing!
The significance of Virginia's dismal ranking can not be overstated. In my experience most nursing home injuries and deaths are due to either the sufficiency or quality of the staff. A nurse or nurse assistant can only provide hands on care to one patient at a time. Therefore, insufficient staff leads to patients not being fed, turned, bathed, etc. Even a hard working and dedicated nurse is bound to make mistakes if he or she has too many patients to care for. Ultimately patients in understaffed nursing homes are at risk for malnutrition, dehydration, falls, pressure ulcers, increased restraint use, and other forms of neglect.
It comes as a surprise to many people, but there are no laws or regulations in Virginia setting forth minimal staffing requirements. The reason is simple: the nursing home industry does not want to hire more staff members because that will lower their profits. Instead they lobby our elected leaders not to impose reasonable staffing requirements. Why day care facilities must comply with staffing regulations and nursing homes do not is due to their political influence.
If you believe a loved one has been injured due to an unstaffed nursing home please contact us by email or call us at (804) 288-1661 to discuss your legal rights. We handle cases throughout Virginia including Richmond, Fredericksburg, Charlottesville, Petersburg, and Hampton Roads.
That is a question commonly asked of attorneys. The technical answer is only the jury gets to decide. In Virginia, the jury is made up of seven members of the community who are sworn to decide a case based on the law and the evidence. At trial the plaintiff must prove that the health care provider breached the standard of care and that breach was a cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The injuries can include medical bills (past and future), lost wages, loss of future earnings, funeral bills, embarrassment for disfigurement, inconvenience, and pain and suffering. The last three are the toughest to calculate because each plaintiff's experience is unique. Damages are also affected by the life experiences of the members of the jury. Different people come to serve on the jury with different senses of what is a fair amount to compensate someone for their injuries.
When I am in settlement negotiations, I think about what are the chances that my client will prevail at trial and the nature of the damages and injuries. I will research past court decisions for guidance. In some cases, I will convene a focus group or several focus groups and ask them to play the role of the jury. Focus groups are expensive to put together, but usually well worth the cost.
Ultimately, most any competent attorney will concede that it is impossible to know with certainty what will happen in court. The uncertainty of a jury trial is often the catalyst for bringing the parties to the negotiating table.
Josh
I do not typically comment on international affairs on our blog, but the assault on our colleagues in Pakistan begs for comments. Very recently, President Musharraf rounded up the Supreme Court, suspended civil liberties, and has arrested 1500 attorneys. Attorneys in grey suit have taken to streets of Pakistan to demand the return to the rule of law. It is a sight not many of us are used to seeing. Attorneys marching through the streets and being carried off by the police for doing nothing more than standing up for the rule of law.
What is happening in Pakistan should be reminder of the importance of our civil liberties. Over 200 years ago, Thomas Jefferson, one of our greatest patriots said:
"Freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us, and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and the blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civil instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty and safety."
The events on the other side of world are an important reminder of the importance of standing up for the rule of law in America. Believe it or not there are fierce lobbying efforts to limit the right to trial by jury in our country. They call themselves "tort reformist" but their real goal is to keep victims of medical malpractice, reckless driving, defective products, and nursing home abuse and neglect from obtaining justice in the courts. Efforts to impose caps on jury verdicts, special malpractice courts, and no-fault auto insurance all add up to taking away the right to trial by jury.
Today I will write to my representatives in Congress asking them to denounce President Musharraf's actions. To email your representative in Congress click here and to reach your Senator click here.
Regards,
Josh Silverman
According to a survey published by the National Law Journal the average billable rate in large law firms is $348/hour! If the only way to hire an attorney was to pay those rates, few people could afford legal representation. One of the privileges of representing victims of medical malpractice, defective products, and serious car accidents is that we do not turn people away because they can not afford our services. We charge most of our clients on a contingency fee. In other words the legal fee is a percentage of the recovery. If there is no recovery there is no legal fee. At most the client is responsible for our out of pocket costs. (That is a rule imposed on all Virginia attorneys by the Virginia State Bar). We represent people of all walks of life. Some of our clients are financially very secure while others rely on government assistance. Many of our clients have been financially destroyed by the carelessness of others (doctors, manufacturers, drunk drivers, etc.). It gives us particular pleasure when we have restored a client to financial independence by obtaining fair and just settlement of the client's case. More information about our legal fees can be found on our website. Feel free to contact us if you would like to discuss your particular situation. Regards, Josh Silverman
I recently read some very alarming statistics circulated by the National Center on Elder Abuse. Studies show that between 1 and 2 million Americans age 65 or older have been subjected to injuries, exploitation and mistreatment by a caregiver. Other studies have found that between 2% and 10% of senior citizens are victims of elder abuse. The most shocking statistic is that for every case of elder abuse or neglect that is reported to authorities, five more go unreported. Click here to read the Fact Sheet from the National Center on Elder Abuse.
My hope for the start of 2008 is that this trend can be reversed. There is a role for each of us in protecting the elderly. In my opinion, the most important thing we can do is remain on the look out for elder abuse and to promptly report it to authorities. If you have a relative or close friend in a nursing home, visit frequently and do not be shy about reporting your concerns.
At Williamson & Lavecchia, L.C. we have a website devoted to nursing home, assisted living, and elder abuse: Virginia-Elder-Abuse-Law.com. We invite you to visit our website to learn more about recognizing the signs of elder abuse and neglect as well as obtaining justice for the victims. You should also feel free to contact me directly to discuss your situation in detail.
Regards,
Joshua Silverman
(804) 288-1661
The Richmond Times Dispatch just reported on its website that the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating possible civil rights violations at the Central Virginia Training Center in Lynchburg, Virginia. The center serves close to 500 residents. No further information is available at this time. Please return to our blog for further information which will be posted when it becomes available.
A Virginia Beach woman faces reckless driving charges after crashing into a police cruiser. According to the Richmond Times Dispatch, the trooper had stopped another vehicle for speeding when the woman driving while talking on her cell phone crashed into his cruiser. Fortunately, no one suffered serious injuries.
This article brings home an important issue for all drivers: Most of us use our cells phones while driving, but the evidence shows that using a cell phone is a distraction. Anytime we are distracted while driving, whether it is using a cell phone, text messaging, etc. we are at greater risk for causing a car accident. I heard on CNN that the engineer operating the commuter train in L.A. that crashed into a freight train may have been text messaging when he missed a red light.
Some states have banned using a hand-held cell phone while driving. Interestingly, there is no strong evidence that hand-held phones are any safer than hands free. The problem is not that we need two hands to drive, it is the mental distraction of focusing on a conversation as opposed to the road. If that logic holds up, wouldn't there be an equal danger talking to a passenger? On the NPR program Car Talk, it was pointed out that when you are talking to a passenger, the passenger can at least tell the driver to "watch out" or may have the sense to stop talking when traffic gets heavy or if there is a dangerous situation on the roadway.
Besides drunk driving, driver distractions are at the top of the list for causing motor vehicle accidents. Hopefully with more attention to these issues, we will all reduce our cell phone use and make the roads safer.
Virginia law permits punitive damages to be awarded when the wrongdoer's conduct was particularly malicious or reflects a conscious disregard for the safety of others.